Most savvy purchasers of a business prefer to acquire the underlying assets of a business over its equity. Although there can be a multitude of reasons for a purchaser to prefer an asset purchase, one of the more common justifications is the avoidance of the historical liabilities associated with the seller’s business. As a result, a purchaser typically takes great care in drafting a purchase agreement to specifically disclaim any liability and responsibility for the historical tax liabilities of a seller. In doing so, a purchaser can avoid any liability with respect to the historical state tax liabilities of a seller, correct? Unfortunately, it is not that simple. Notwithstanding the terms of a well-crafted tax liability allocation and disclaimer provision in a purchase agreement, in a number of states as a matter of state law, a purchaser may nevertheless be liable for the historical state tax liabilities of a seller. Of course, a purchaser may have the indemnity provisions in the purchase agreement to rely upon, however, an indemnity provision still has to be enforced and may not have much value if there is no readily available source of recovery or if the seller is not creditworthy. Although liability for a seller’s state tax obligations can be draconian, fortunately, most states provide a mechanism to avoid successor liability. Typically, this involves requesting tax clearance from a state and/or placing...Read More
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Tax Blog is published by Dickinson Wright PLLC to inform the public of important developments within the firm and practice areas. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. We encourage you to consult a Dickinson Wright attorney if you have specific questions or concerns relating to any of the topics covered in this blog.